-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13.0] Improvements on server.env.techname.mixin #75
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re. the mixin inherit (154090a), I guess it wasn't done like this before because one may use server.env.techname.mixin without server.env.mixing but I can't see why one would want to do that.. I find this way easier to use and in most cases saves a few line breaks
yeah, it was in my mind for a while. At first I wanted to keep it isolated but it turns out you always use them in combo.
Thanks for taking care of my TODOs! 😄
1219072
to
bb068df
Compare
…instead of onchange.
bb068df
to
ac0d12e
Compare
@ivantodorovich could you test this on OCA/search-engine ? |
@ivantodorovich ping :) |
It seems ok |
just use this change there and see if you get a green build ;) |
Indeed it's not working.
But also I tried that, and it's not working as expected. Since I couldn't find a simple solution for now :/ so best if we close this and reevaluate in a future migration IMO |
@ivantodorovich you can reconsider this here #122 😉 |
ping @simahawk
What do you think about this?
Re. the mixin inherit (154090a), I guess it wasn't done like this before because one may use
server.env.techname.mixin
withoutserver.env.mixing
but I can't see why one would want to do that.. I find this way easier to use and in most cases saves a few line breaks